It would be appearing the contradiction to read the title above. Pertanggungjawaban hukum forex speaks about to eliminate the life and to preserving the retributive life it taken on the other side. Human Rights concept is to protect the life of mankind. And to eliminate the life itself it would be against the odd for the concept.
Right to live is an ancient and basic right for human being. Ancient because right to live is stand as existence of the mankind itself. Basic because right to live is where no man has the right to confiscate the life of other man without compelling reasons. What happen is, somehow the confiscate of other life is happened. At this moment the law take over to proving the truth of those compelling reasons.
Human Rights droits de l’homme, derechos humanos, menschenrechte or the rights of man. Dworkin quote by Donnelly states Right is English, has two central moral and political senses: rectitude and entitlement. Rectitude, we speak of the right thing to do of something being right. Entitlement, we speak of someone having a right. In Indonesia, Human Rights clauses had been represented in Pancasila as weltanschauung and then becoming the grundnorm of law. The general psychology of crime renders it highly improbable that biological causes are as influential in the production of crime as Lombroso thought.
Crime is a matter of conduct, and conduct is a matter of habit. Now, when large numbers of individuals live together in very complex relations, their habits have to be nicely adjusted to one another if the welfare of the group is to be assured. Therefore, crime is about misconduct a member of society and its one stain to the civilization. It militate the substance of UDHR. Because the crime is a stain to the civilization, therefore it needs to remove. Duff explained the central question asked by philosophers of punishment is: What can justify punishment?